Defendant: Twitter & facebook
reproach Sustained meaning misconduct, information overload
period : Since 2004 [ facebook ] / Since 2006 [ Twitter ]
I tweet I use facebook including state news service and blog. I also use a smart phone, and bring me several times daily on the latest stand is one thing I can tell you from my several years now facebook - and Twitter tell experience: I have not even yet I was informed by others about their toilet habits!
" would indeed be absurd. , think some. " Surprising, when everybody thinks the least important things in his life online record and report to the entire community. , "say others. The fact is I am not yet happened. - Ah, but - once. Once someone has made. But this someone wanted to point through the abuse of status messages that status messages are abused. The method of pre-held mirror so to speak.
It suits me to say really far away that all the status messages, which is my online friends, it's at facebook or Twitter to post for me or others interesting. I maintain nor even that all my posts and should reach everyone in the world and are interested. It is also not that interesting, I never learn from others via facebook or Twitter . Article, which I would never even stumble. Blog entries that I had not found. News, which I was still completely unknown. All this can be found at all the Tweets at Twitter and Snapshots facebook .
Why does one actually uses those boxes that constantly ask and almost familiar by what you're doing? - I personally use this service very varied - sometimes with a sense - sometimes simply because I have just lust. Sometimes it is actually a link to a [my opinion] interesting site or a homemade photo I would like to share with others. The other time is it again a song line of text that I find very beautiful, but for most others probably only a small part of the " News " list is being flown over skillfully. Fair enough.
I expect so too have no idea that strikes every post like a bomb and half the community emotionally from the office chair travels. When I saw the news at facebook , finally, I hesitate not at all. This is the clearest embodiment of the freedom to read - both the right to read and the right to non-reading involves.
And this brings us to the next argument: " But why does it uses for any e-mails to tell his friends the latest thing? "It's simple: send an e-mail is [at least for me] in order of importance far beyond that of a status message or Tweets . That is to say that I have not read any Tweet must, but it certainly would say from an e-mail. More specifically: If I send an e-mail, I would like the recipients of this reading and I might even be disappointed if I get no feedback. But if I at Twitter something read or not read, that's absolutely fine.
Keyed you can about status messages, or Tweets say, there are clear messages that we, and also determines the world does not need this but either through or fly over " Hide " can be taken from our awareness. In Twitter can block the disruptive or them Unfollow - is already calm. Studi VZ it does with the "mark as nuisance" to the point and is therefore also a way to grapevine personalize.
Conclusion: status messages are no Grauss - as long as one knows his stuff.
0 comments:
Post a Comment